IABO Code Talk

 
 
I am having trouble understanding 09 IBC Tab 508.4 which is nearly the same as 06 Tab 503.3.3, at least for my question. Per both tables, no occupancy separation is required between either an F-2 and an S-2 or an F-1 and an S-1 occupancy, however a 1 or 2 hour separation is required between an F-2 and an S-1 occupancy or between an F-1 and an S-2 occupancy.

Could someone please explain the reasoning behind this? It seems counterintuitive to me that a more stringent requirement would be required in the latter case.

Thanks for any enlightenment.
Jerry Stoffel
Building Inspector / Plans Examiner
City of Dubuque.
 


Comments

Terry B
04/05/2010 12:12

This is because of the level of hazard, F-1 & S-1 are the same hazard level, they both allow combustible materials, F-1 to S-2, one allows combustible and the one only allows non-combustible materials, that is why the separation is required.

Reply
04/07/2011 23:06

When in spring the sweet showers fall
That pierce winter's drought to the root and all.....

Reply
04/08/2011 01:50

Hey, appreciate it for taking the effort to do this. I like your webpage, although it took a sluggish reader like me some time to via throughout entire page and the many comments.

Reply
04/13/2011 00:36

I may never be a typophile, but articles like this may just help me bridge the gap. Thanks for the hard work.

Reply
04/14/2011 01:34

Thanks for sharing new art print,This is very amazing for me.Thank you for the inspiration!

Reply
04/21/2011 19:52

Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view. Thank you for sharing. At the same time,i love best pram very much .Welcome to look at my website and blog articles.Hope we can become good friends, and exchange and to help each other! Thanks!!

Reply
05/04/2012 19:07

Zhu0505This is really a wonderful website, great.

Reply



Leave a Reply